What are your thoughts on a future where code is represented as a structured model, rather than text? Do you think that AI-powered coding assistants benefit from that?

Most coding assistants — with or without “modern “AI” — also do reasoning and manipulation of structures.

NOT DATA … BUT MEANING!

A slogan that might help you get past the current fads is:

What happens in Sweden if you cannot pay a hospital debt you did not know about until recently but willing to pay when your finances improve?

plus(a, b) for(i, 1, x, […])

/ \ and ⁄ / | \

First, it’s worth noting that the “syntax recognition” phase of most compilers already does build a “structured model”, often in what used to be called a “canonical form” (an example of this might be a “pseudo-function tree” where every elementary process description is put into the same form — so both “a + b” and “for i := 1 to x do […]” are rendered as

How can Ukraine and Russia resolve their conflicts?

+ for

These structures are made precisely to allow programs to “reason” about some parts of lower level meaning, and in many cases to rearrange the structure to preserve meaning but to make the eventual code that is generated more efficient.

Another canonical form could be Lisp S-expressions, etc.

Your left and right brain hear language differently − a neuroscientist explains how - The Conversation

a b i 1 x []

It’s important to realize that “modern “AI” doesn’t understand human level meanings any better today (in many cases: worse!). So it is not going to be able to serve as much of a helper in a general coding assistant.

Long ago in the 50s this was even thought of as a kind of “AI” and this association persisted into the 60s. Several Turing Awards were given for progress on this kind of “machine reasoning”.

Elon Musk’s xAI could become the fourth hectocorn, as it seeks $113 billion valuation in small share sale - Sherwood News

i.e. “operator like things” at the nodes …

in structures, such as: